<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting More From Google Images Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Reformed Blackhat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ask Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-5660</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-5660</guid>
		<description>My websites 60% traffic comes from Google images. I think breaking frames could help me monetize this traffic. But what about the search engines? are they ok with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My websites 60% traffic comes from Google images. I think breaking frames could help me monetize this traffic. But what about the search engines? are they ok with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Moennig</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-5027</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Moennig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-5027</guid>
		<description>Excellent tip, this is what i have been looking for as much of my traffic comes from google images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tip, this is what i have been looking for as much of my traffic comes from google images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickycakes</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3926</link>
		<dc:creator>nickycakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3926</guid>
		<description>yikes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yikes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImagesAndWords</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>ImagesAndWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>Nice tips there. Been meaning to test this out. First to go is my goatse wallpaper library :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tips there. Been meaning to test this out. First to go is my goatse wallpaper library <img src='http://www.nickycakes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3896</guid>
		<description>On a side note, I also advocate adding the TITLE tag to your images to provide a bit more information for your readers.  I&#039;ve assumed that this may also give Google et al more to chew on as well - do you know if there&#039;s any merit to this (in terms of SEO)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a side note, I also advocate adding the TITLE tag to your images to provide a bit more information for your readers.  I&#8217;ve assumed that this may also give Google et al more to chew on as well &#8211; do you know if there&#8217;s any merit to this (in terms of SEO)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>Just in time for the Miley Ray Cyrus pics! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in time for the Miley Ray Cyrus pics! <img src='http://www.nickycakes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Volume</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3880</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash Volume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3880</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve  been using Java Script to bust out of  Google Image Search iframes for quite a while now. Luckily have not been banned yet.... you could always obfuscate the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve  been using Java Script to bust out of  Google Image Search iframes for quite a while now. Luckily have not been banned yet&#8230;. you could always obfuscate the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barman</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3865</link>
		<dc:creator>Barman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3865</guid>
		<description>Now how do you monetize this?!

http://images.google.com/images?q=nickycakes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now how do you monetize this?!</p>
<p><a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=nickycakes" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/images?q=nickycakes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3864</guid>
		<description>Google images is great for some types of sites, like celebrity or music sites for one.  A lot of people who search for britney spears images want to hotlink them on their myspace page or whatever, so generate watermarked versions of the photos plastered with your logo and url, then write some rules to serve the watermarked version to any site other than your own, which obviously includes google images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google images is great for some types of sites, like celebrity or music sites for one.  A lot of people who search for britney spears images want to hotlink them on their myspace page or whatever, so generate watermarked versions of the photos plastered with your logo and url, then write some rules to serve the watermarked version to any site other than your own, which obviously includes google images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.nickycakes.com/getting-more-from-google-images-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-3860</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickycakes.com/?p=169#comment-3860</guid>
		<description>Another awesome post...with practical advice.  Keep up the good work.  iframe illustrates yet another Google hypocriticism:  how we are forbidden from using it in AdWords, yet it somehow becomes acceptable with their Google Images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another awesome post&#8230;with practical advice.  Keep up the good work.  iframe illustrates yet another Google hypocriticism:  how we are forbidden from using it in AdWords, yet it somehow becomes acceptable with their Google Images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
